MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904571180 · doi:10.1134/s1054661818040028

An Enhanced Histogram of Oriented Gradient Descriptor for Numismatic Applications

2018· article· en· W2904571180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePattern Recognition and Image Analysis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCurrency Recognition and Detection
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersUniversiti Malaya
KeywordsHistogramSliding window protocolObject (grammar)Window (computing)Histogram of oriented gradientsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) is one of the most widely used methods to extract the gradient features for object recognition and consistently shows high accuracy rates when compared to other descriptors. The major drawbacks of using the HOG method are the necessity of finding an optimal window size to fit the whole object; and the exhaustive search mechanism represented by a fixed window size sliding through the whole image to locate and recognize objects. This research proposes an efficient and robust Dynamic-HOG as an improvement to the traditional HOG method to locate and recognize structured objects in images. The proposed method works by locating and analyzing the structured objects in images in order to define a dynamic window size w.r.t. each object size. Moreover, the Dynamic-HOG method requires much less processing time by eliminating the exhaustive search mechanism. The method defines the height and width thresholds of objects and bounds each object with a window w.r.t. its size while ignoring non–object edges. It fits structured objects of a close range of heights and widths. This paper considers the characters that are minted on coins of different languages and sizes as the objects to recognize. There are several papers in the literature discussing coin recognition problem and proposing solutions based on various sets of features extracted from the entire coin image. This research also proposes a new method for coin recognition by focusing on recognize coins based on smaller part of the coin image which are the characters. Our method is evaluated on coins from diverse countries with different background complexity. The proposed method achieved precision and recall rates as high as 98.08 and 98.23%, respectively; which demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it