MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904614221

INTEGRATING WAVE AND TIDAL CURRENT POWER: Case Studies Through Modelling and Simulation

2011· preprint· en· W2904614221 on OpenAlexaff
David Ben Haim, Joseba López-Mendia, P. Ricci, Jahangir Khan, Daniel Conte de Leon, S. Arabi, A. Moshref, Gouri Bhuyan, Anne Blavette, D. O’Sullivan, Raymond Alcorn

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsPowertech Labs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarine energyTidal powerRenewable energyWave powerWork (physics)Energy currentResource (disambiguation)Current (fluid)Environmental scienceMeteorologyEnvironmental resource managementEnergy (signal processing)Computer scienceEngineeringMarine engineeringGeographyElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean renewable energy is an emerging resource option. In the long term, ocean renewableenergy has the potential to provide a significant share of global energy needs. Currently,some of the conversion technologies for harnessing variable wave and tidal current energyresources are reaching commercial stage. Several pilot projects, having sizes upto 2 MW,are operating in various parts of the world. Also multi-MW wave and tidal current energyfarms are being developed. Identification of the near- and longer-term technical potentialof wave and tidal current resources that could be integrated to existing and futureelectricity infrastructure in a region is an important step towards developing integratedlong-term energy planning for the region and relevant policy instruments to realize thepotential.During the past three years, a collaborative project related to integration of wave and tidalcurrent energy into electrical systems (known as Annex III) was carried out under theumbrella of the International Energy Agency’s Implementing Agreement on Ocean EnergySystems (OES-IA) (www.iea-oceans.org). Following the completion of the Work Packages1 and 2 under the Annex III of IEA’s Ocean Energy Implementing Agreement, a numberof landmark activities took place within the emerging global ocean energy sector. Thisreport summarizes the work performed through the Work Package 3 activities. The reportprovides insight into the grid integration of wave and tidal current resources, particularlythrough case studies spanning a wide range of scenarios. Prior to discussing these case studies, a number of generic power system related aspects (such as system control, stability, power quality, grid codes, etc.) are highlighted in thisreport. In addition, brief discussions are presented on wave and tidal resourcevariability/predictability, offshore farm layout, system control and characteristics, plantlocation (in contrast to the location of load centers, network topology, etc.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicWave and Wind Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207