MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905239624 · doi:10.1109/coase.2018.8560529

Hierarchical Decentralized Robust Control Design for Modular and Reconfigurable Robots

2018· article· en· W2905239624 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReconfigurabilityModular designComputer scienceRobust controlRobotTask (project management)Controller (irrigation)Control engineeringRobustness (evolution)Set (abstract data type)Control (management)Control systemMotion controlEngineeringArtificial intelligenceSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modular and reconfigurable robots (MRRs) are not only adaptable to multiple industrial task execution but they also have additional advantages such as versatile hardware, easier maintenance, and transportability. However, such features render the controller design that manages a variety of robot configurations with reliable performance more complex. The disturbances and uncertainties, in addition to reconfigurability, introduce difficulty in controlling MRRs. This paper aims to enhance MRRs' performance in terms of accurate and stable motion. Our proposed robust low-level control output set its nominal control parameters, and utilizes a sliding mode control approach to make the system performance robust to uncertainties and time-variations. The efficiency of the proposed control methodology is verified via simulations at the end.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207