MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modified Differential Golomb Arithmetic Lossless Compression Algorithm for Smart Grid Applications

2018· article· en· W2905251131 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Aleshinloye, Abdul Bais

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLossless compressionComputer scienceGolomb codingData compressionAlgorithmLossy compressionSmart gridComputer data storageSmart meterGridTransmission (telecommunications)Compression ratioReal-time computingComputer engineeringComputer hardwareImage compressionArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advancement of the electric grid has led to tremendous growth in data generated from the installed sensors. Efficient storage and transmission of this data pose a challenge for the utilities. Thus, it is required to have a data compression technique to reduce the data size. There are state of the art compression algorithms that can be applied to reduce the amount of data for storage and transmission in the smart grid environment. Some of these algorithms exploit characteristics of the load profile data, where consecutive data samples have very small differences. However, performance of these algorithms deteriorate when there are frequent large differences. We propose a modification that improves compression performance when there are large value differences. The algorithm is evaluated on smart meter load profile data at different data resolution. We show that the proposed changes improve performance by 2-20% for different resolutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207