MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modified Differential Golomb Arithmetic Lossless Compression Algorithm for Smart Grid Applications

2018· article· en· W2905251131 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLossless compressionComputer scienceGolomb codingData compressionAlgorithmLossy compressionSmart gridComputer data storageSmart meterGridTransmission (telecommunications)Compression ratioReal-time computingComputer engineeringComputer hardwareImage compressionArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advancement of the electric grid has led to tremendous growth in data generated from the installed sensors. Efficient storage and transmission of this data pose a challenge for the utilities. Thus, it is required to have a data compression technique to reduce the data size. There are state of the art compression algorithms that can be applied to reduce the amount of data for storage and transmission in the smart grid environment. Some of these algorithms exploit characteristics of the load profile data, where consecutive data samples have very small differences. However, performance of these algorithms deteriorate when there are frequent large differences. We propose a modification that improves compression performance when there are large value differences. The algorithm is evaluated on smart meter load profile data at different data resolution. We show that the proposed changes improve performance by 2-20% for different resolutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207