MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905291051 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30232-9

The opioid death crisis in Canada: crucial lessons for public health

2018· review· en· W2905291051 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Public Health · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser UniversityBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of TorontoBritish Columbia Centre for Disease ControlFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of AucklandSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsPublic healthMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)OpioidMEDLINE2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthVirologyNursingInternal medicineDiseaseOutbreakLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A chief coroner investigation in British Columbia, Canada, identified an “inordinately high number” of drug-related deaths related to a “very real and very serious” drug problem, and recommended unconventional measures to reduce mortality.1Cain JV Office of the Chief Coroner: report of the Task Force into illicit narcotic overdose deaths in British Columbia.http://drugpolicy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Cain-Report.pdfDate: 1994Date accessed: October 11, 2018Google Scholar This occurred 25 years ago, in 1993, the number of drug-related deaths in British Columbia peaked at 330.1Cain JV Office of the Chief Coroner: report of the Task Force into illicit narcotic overdose deaths in British Columbia.http://drugpolicy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Cain-Report.pdfDate: 1994Date accessed: October 11, 2018Google Scholar Today, the epidemic of primarily opioid-related deaths in Canada is far worse than it was a quarter of a century ago. In 2017, there were 1473 drug-related deaths in British Columbia and 3996 in Canada in total—an increase of more than 400% from 1993—and these deaths now account for substantially greater mortality than motor-vehicle accidents and other leading causes of premature deaths.2Government of CanadaNational report: apparent opioid-related deaths in Canada.https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-living/national-report-apparent-opioid-related-deaths-released-september-2018.htmlDate: 2018Date accessed: October 11, 2018Google Scholar Since the early 1990s, when illicit drug users were considered a population at a highly increased risk of HIV, and overdose deaths were primarily from combined heroin and cocaine injecting, interventions have seen major shifts towards more health-oriented responses. For example, Canada has implemented and expanded syringe and naloxone distribution, opioid substitution treatment, and supervised consumption sites.3Wood E Strategies for reducing opioid-overdose deaths—lessons from Canada.N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 1565-1567Crossref PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar Despite these seminal evolutions of health interventions, there remain catastrophically high levels of drug-related mortality. This unfolding opioid death crisis bears a tragic lesson: although the interventions to date have protected human lives, current actions are simply not sufficient. Three leading contributors to the current opioid crisis exist. The first involves the rising numbers of increasingly potent medical opioid prescriptions since 2000. Excessive prescription practices have rendered Canada's opioid consumption second only to that of the USA, and have exposed large numbers of Canadians to very addictive opioid drugs.4Murphy Y Goldner E Fischer B Prescription opioid use, harms and interventions in Canada: a review update of new developments and findings since 2010.Pain physician. 2015; 18: e605-e614PubMed Google Scholar As many as one in five Canadians used a medical-grade opioid during peak years (eg, 2008–10).5Canadian Institute for Health InformationPan-Canadian trends in the prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines—2012 to 2017.https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/opioid-prescribing-june2018-en-web.pdfDate: 2018Date accessed: October 11, 2018Google Scholar Not only did this overprescription directly lead to many people becoming opioid dependent, it also provided the main supply of opioids for non-medical use. Second, as the harmful consequences of excessive opioid-exposure became apparent, a series of efforts to curtail medical opioid supply and related harms were initiated. These included the de-scheduling of select opioid drugs (eg, slow-release oxycodone), intensified prescription monitoring, and restrictive prescription guidelines.6Fischer B Rehm J Tyndall M Effective Canadian policy to reduce harms from prescription opioids: learning from past failures.CMAJ. 2016; 188: 1240Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar Although well intended, these measures did not account for the consequences on the growing population of opioid users at increased risk, and specifically the volatile and hazardous dynamics of opioid supply. Coinciding with the reductions in medical opioid prescription, which starting around 2012, an illicit supply of increasingly potent opioids proliferated, filling the emergent supply gaps left by the reduced availability of medical opioids in Canada.7Hayashi K Milloy MJ Lysyshyn M et al.Substance use patterns associated with recent exposure to fentanyl among people who inject drugs in Vancouver, Canada: a cross-sectional urine toxicology screening study.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018; 183: 1-6Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar This included an unprecedented rise in the availability of synthetic opioids (eg, fentanyl) and hazardous analogues such as carfentanil, which put opioid users at an exponentially higher risk of overdose compared with conventional opioids. Statistics from across Canadian jurisdictions clearly illustrate concurrent reductions in medical opioid-related deaths and increases in illicit opioid fatalities. Third, the circumstances outlined essentially render the current opioid mortality crisis in Canada, at its core, a crisis of toxic drug exposure, which public health and intervention systems to date have failed to effectively address. Existing interventions have reduced mortality and morbidity among some groups of users; however, they have been vastly insufficient. Existing responses largely consist of peripheral measures that are unable to comprehensively address the crux of the problem, in which toxic opioid exposure has resulted in excessive increases in fatalities. As with infectious diseases (eg, Ebola and SARS), outbreaks require preventive vaccinations and emergency treatment for populations at increased risk.8Frieden TR Damon I Bell BP Kenyon T Nichol S Ebola 2014—new challenges, new global response and responsibility.N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 1177-1180Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar Similarly, the current opioid crisis in Canada would require systematic identification and protection of an estimated population of as many as 1 million users at risk from toxic opioid products, through provision of a safer opioid supply. 9Fischer B Varatharajan T Shield K Rehm J Jones W Crude estimates of prescription opioid-related misuse and use disorder populations towards informing intervention system need in Canada.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018; 189: 76-79Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar This was the premise for a local project that aims to distribute medical-grade hydromorphone through secure dispensing machines in Vancouver.10Coletta A Canada's fix to the opioid crisis: Vending machines that distribute prescription opioids to addicts.The Washington Post. Jan 24, 2018; https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/01/24/the-canadian-fix-to-the-opioid-crisis-a-vending-machine-that-distributes-prescription-opioids-to-addicts/?utm_term=.e36120455975Date accessed: October 11, 2018Google Scholar However, such measures to prevent the use of toxic opioids have not been systematically implemented in the overall Canadian public health response. The current opioid mortality crisis constitutes a much greater challenge than the crisis of the early 1990s, because it involves a vastly larger population at risk and the availability of more hazardous drugs. Both crises show that at-risk users primarily require protection from hazardous drug products. However, this observation has not been acted upon and many people involved with non-medical opioids continue to rely on supplies that are unregulated and toxic. This is likely to result in substantially more deaths. Our understanding of science and medicine should improve the nature and implementation of practical public health interventions and the consequential protection of human health over time. Therefore, it is time for the opioid death crisis in Canada to be tackled better, and not worse, than the “very real and very serious” drug death crisis in the 1990s.1Cain JV Office of the Chief Coroner: report of the Task Force into illicit narcotic overdose deaths in British Columbia.http://drugpolicy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Cain-Report.pdfDate: 1994Date accessed: October 11, 2018Google Scholar We declare no competing interests. Canada's overdose crisis: authorities are not acting fast enoughWe appreciate the lessons outlined by Benedikt Fischer and colleagues1 in their Comment on the opioid overdose crisis in Canada. From the frontline perspective, working at an overdose prevention site at the epicentre of the overdose crisis in Canada's largest city, our major lesson is that all levels of government are not acting fast enough, and that the stigma against and criminalisation of people who use drugs are impeding the public health response. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.296
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it