Stochastic Simulation of Complex Fluid Flows (Progress Report for period 07/01/2016 - 06/30/2018)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At a microscopic scale, fluids are composed of molecules whose positions and velocities are random. This gives rise to thermal fluctuations that span the whole range of scales from the microscopic through the mesoscopic, and even the macroscopic. The inclusion of thermal fluctuations is crucial in multi-scale models, which are an important theme in the research program of the DOE Office of Science, and in particular the ASCR Applied Mathematics program's priority focus area on modeling of complex systems involving processes that span vastly different time and/or length scales. In this five-year Early Career project, the PI Aleksandar Donev and collaborators developed computational algorithms for modeling complex fluid mixtures at small scales using a formulation based on fluctuating hydrodynamics. Novel computational methods were developed to model complex fluids with increasing physical complexity, starting from binary miscible and immiscible mixtures, going through multispecies non-reactive and reactive mixtures, and culminating with reactive electrolytes mixtures of neutral molecules and ions. In close collaboration with the group of John Bell at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the methods were implemented in a scalable computational framework suitable for modern parallel supercomputers, and made publicly available on github. A number of physical examples in which giant nonequilibrium fluctuations are improtant were studied, with a special focus on instabilities at a liquid-liquid interface driven by gravity, diffusion, reactions, and/or electric fields. The methods and codes developed in this project are expected to enable other novel applications in the DOE Basic Energy Sciences program, and engineering sciences more broadly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".