MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905402286 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-267-5_4

‘We Have To Give Up Business As Usual’: Anti-Nuclear Protests and the Construction of a Defence of ‘Legitimate Civil Resistance’

2018· book-chapter· en· W2905402286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueT.M.C. Asser Press eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsResistance (ecology)Political scienceCivil defenseLaw and economicsPolitical economyCriminologyLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over many decades, individuals and groups have protested the use of nuclear energy as well as the proliferation and continued possession of nuclear armaments. When faced with criminal prosecution, many have sought acquittals via the necessity defence or through jury nullification. The use of the necessity defence and jury nullificationJury nullification has had some minimal to very modest success in some jurisdictions. Furthermore, there are considerable shortcomings related to these devices. This chapter argues that a new defence should be formulated to provide viable and appropriate protection for those engagedLegitimate Civil Resistance in “legitimate civil resistanceCivil resistance” and fleshes out the elements of this new protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it