MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906170387 · doi:10.1109/mpel.2018.2874509

Multilevel Inverters for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Applications: Examining Emerging Trends

2018· article· en· W2906170387 on OpenAlexaff
Xing Zhang, Tao Zhao, Wang Mao, Don Tan, Liuchen Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Electronics Magazine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemInverterGridMaximum power point trackingComputer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringElectronic engineeringVoltageEngineeringMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the cost of photovoltaic (PV) modules and inverters continues to decline, PV power generation is gaining more and more share in the electricity market. The market and its customers are demanding higher-performance inverters in terms of efficiency, power density, module-level control, and increasingly higher voltage and power levels. Because of their outstanding performance, multilevel inverters have attracted the attention of researchers and technology developers alike. This article presents commonly used multilevel inverter technologies for grid-connected PV applications, including five-level inverters, single-phase nonisolated inverters, and three-phase, isolated cascaded H-bridge inverters. Detailed discussions are presented, along with characteristics of PV applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations147
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Electronics MagazineSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207