MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906582908 · doi:10.1289/isee.2011.01967

MOBI-KIDS; STUDY ON COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT AND BRAIN TUMOURS IN YOUNG PEOPLE

2011· article· en· W2906582908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile phoneMedicineResidenceRecall biasFamily historyPhonePopulationEnvironmental healthDemographySurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Brain tumours are the second most common neoplasms in young people. Apart from exposure to ionizing radiation and genetic predispositions, little is known about risk factors for these tumours. Mobi-Kids will study effects of environmental factors on brain tumour risk in young people, with particular focus on electromagnetic fields from mobile phones and other communication technologies. Methods: Mobi-Kids is a collaborative case-control study starting in 12 countries (Austria, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, India, Israel, Italy, Spain, Taiwan, The Netherland)s using a common core protocol. Cases are 10-24 years old patients newly diagnosed with a brain tumour. Controls are patients hospitalized for appendicitis within the participating regions, individually matched to cases on age, sex and region of residence. A face-to-face interview will be held with participants and their parents to assess lifestyle, residential and school history, use of communication technologies, exposure to environmental risk factors, medical history and family history of cancer. Particular attention will be paid to issues of potential selection bias related to the low response rates of population-based controls (by selecting hospitalised controls) and potential recall errors (by validating questionnaire responses on mobile phone use with user data from network operators). Improved exposure indices for RF will be derived taking into account spatial distribution of energy in the brain at different ages; ELF from the phones will also be considered, as well as other important sources of EMF and chemical exposures in the general environment of young people. Results: Data collection has started in most participating countries.. The study is expected to include nearly 2000 brain tumour cases and twice as many controls during a 2.5-year study period. Conclusion: MOBI-KIDS will generate novel insights in brain tumour aetiology among young people. In particular it will address the association with information technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it