MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907118206 · doi:10.1289/isee.2013.o-3-41-03

Blood Lead Concentrations and Cardiovascular Mortality in the United States: The NHANES Mortality Follow-up Cohort Study

2013· article· en· W2907118206 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce P. Lanphear, Stephen Rauch, Richard Hornung, Ryan W. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioMyocardial infarctionProportional hazards modelInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusCohortConfoundingCohort studyNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyMortality rateRisk factorConfidence intervalPopulationEnvironmental healthEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Environmental lead exposure, measured using blood lead concentration, is an established risk factor for hypertension, but the relation of blood lead concentration with cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and the number of deaths attributable to it are uncertain. Aims: To quantify the contributions of lead exposure to all-cause mortality and CVD mortality in the United States. Methods: We quantified the contribution of blood lead concentration to total deaths and deaths from CVD, ischemic heart disease (IHD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among 11,261 adults (>30 years at baseline) in the NHANES Follow-up Study. Participants were followed through December 31, 2006. We used Cox proportional hazard regression and adjusted for a variety of confounders, including sex, age, race, current and former tobacco use, income, obesity, diet, cholesterol, urinary cadmium, diabetes, hypertension, and physical activity. Results: During a median follow-up of 14.5 years, 3,290 participants died; 1,430 (43%) from CVD. The geometric mean blood lead of participants at baseline was 2.95 mg/dL; 3,065 (21.7%) had a blood lead >5 mg/dL. Adjusted hazard ratios for death among participants with blood lead levels in the highest tertile (> 3.9 mg/dL) compared with the lowest tertile (< 1.9 mg/dL) were 1.28 (95%CI=1.10, 1.49) for total mortality, 1.56 (95%CI=1.20, 2.01) for CVD mortality, 1.71 (95%CI=1.19, 2.45) for IHD mortality and 1.97 (95%CI=1.15, 3.36) for AMI mortality. Adjusted population attributable fractions were 11.2% (95% CI=0.13, 21) for total mortality, 19.2% (95%CI=4.4 to 32) for CVD mortality, 23.3% for IHD mortality (95%CI=5.3 to 38), and 27.1% (95%CI=5.7 to 43.6) for AMI mortality. We estimate that lead exposure accounts for 247,000 avoidable deaths each year; 175,000 from CVD, 122,000 from IHD deaths and 55,000 from AMI. Conclusion: Low-level, environmental lead exposure is a leading, but largely ignored risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207