MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diseñando medios sociales para el aprendizaje

2014· article· es· W2907156991 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Mexicana de Bachillerato a Distancia · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Technology
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se presentan dos modelos conceptuales quehemos desarrollado para comprender las formasen que los medios sociales pueden apoyarel aprendizaje. Uno se relaciona con el aspecto“social”, que describe las distintas maneras enque las personas pueden aprender con otras yunas de otras en una o varias de tres formassociales: grupos, redes y conjuntos. El otromodelo son “medios” y describe cómo se construyenlas tecnologías y los roles que desempeñala gente en la creación y representaciónde éstos, tratándolos en términos de lo blandoy lo duro que pueden ser. Ambos modelos soncomplementarios: ninguno proporciona unaimagen completa pero, de forma conjunta, ayudana explicar cómo y por qué los distintos usosde los medios sociales tienen éxito o fracasan.Por último, se ofrecen algunas sugerencias encuanto a cómo los medios utilizados para apoyardistintas formas sociales pueden ablandarse oendurecerse para una aplicación más efectiva.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it