MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907350733

Les enfants comme collaborateurs. Comprendre les mondes musicaux des enfants en reconsidérant les constructions de l’enfance

2018· article· fr· W2907350733 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Music Education Insights
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La construction de l’enfance, en tant qu’espace liminal situe quelque part entre le bas âge (la petite enfance) et l’âge adulte, comporte des implications locales et globales determinantes pour la maniere dont les ethnomusicologues approchent l’etude des cultures musicales enfantines. Dans les champs de l’ethnomusicologie et de l’education musicale notamment, les enfants ont souvent ete consideres comme de simples receptacles de l’enseignement musical, qui construisent leurs competences musicales a travers une transmission des connaissances « de haut en bas », effectuee des adultes aux enfants. C’est ainsi que le discours positiviste conceptualise souvent les enfants comme des adultes en devenir plutot que comme des personnes a part entiere. Base sur ma propre recherche collaborative menee avec des enfants et des adolescents des communautes Vhavenda d’Afrique du Sud, cet article examine comment des methodologies de recherche visant a privilegier le point de vue des enfants permettent une meilleure comprehension des cultures musicales enfantines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.010
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it