Les enfants comme collaborateurs. Comprendre les mondes musicaux des enfants en reconsidérant les constructions de l’enfance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La construction de l’enfance, en tant qu’espace liminal situe quelque part entre le bas âge (la petite enfance) et l’âge adulte, comporte des implications locales et globales determinantes pour la maniere dont les ethnomusicologues approchent l’etude des cultures musicales enfantines. Dans les champs de l’ethnomusicologie et de l’education musicale notamment, les enfants ont souvent ete consideres comme de simples receptacles de l’enseignement musical, qui construisent leurs competences musicales a travers une transmission des connaissances « de haut en bas », effectuee des adultes aux enfants. C’est ainsi que le discours positiviste conceptualise souvent les enfants comme des adultes en devenir plutot que comme des personnes a part entiere. Base sur ma propre recherche collaborative menee avec des enfants et des adolescents des communautes Vhavenda d’Afrique du Sud, cet article examine comment des methodologies de recherche visant a privilegier le point de vue des enfants permettent une meilleure comprehension des cultures musicales enfantines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".