Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a novel frame prediction method using a deep neural network (DNN), with the goal of improving the video coding efficiency. The proposed DNN makes use of decoded frames, at both the encoder and decoder to predict the textures of the current coding block. Unlike conventional inter-prediction, the proposed method does not require any motion information to be transferred between the encoder and the decoder. Still, both the uni-directional and bi-directional predictions are possible using the proposed DNN, which is enabled by the use of the temporal index channel, in addition to the color channels. In this paper, we developed a jointly trained DNN for both uni-directional and bi-directional predictions, as well as separate networks for uni-directional and bi-directional predictions, and compared the efficacy of both the approaches. The proposed DNNs were compared with the conventional motion-compensated prediction in the latest video coding standard, High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), in terms of the BD-bitrate. The experiments show that the proposed joint DNN (for both uni-directional and bi-directional predictions) reduces the luminance bitrate by about 4.4%, 2.4%, and 2.3% in the low delay $P$ , low delay, and random access configurations, respectively. In addition, using the separately trained DNNs brings further bit savings of about 0.3%-0.5%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it