MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908757733 · doi:10.1109/ism.2018.00027

Neural Networks Based Fractional Pixel Motion Estimation for HEVC

2018· article· en· W2908757733 on OpenAlexaff
Ehab M. Ibrahim, Emad Badry, Ahmed M. Abdelsalam, Ibrahim L. Abdalla, Mohammed S. Sayed, Hossam M. H. Shalaby

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuarter-pixel motionMotion estimationCoding (social sciences)PixelData compressionArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkInterpolation (computer graphics)Reference softwareComputer visionReduction (mathematics)SoftwareAlgorithmMotion (physics)MathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) provides more compression than its predecessors. One of the modules that contributes to higher compression rates is the Motion Estimation module, which consists of Integer and Fractional pixel motion estimation. The Fractional Motion Estimation (FME) process performs interpolations to find sample values at fractional-pixel locations, which can be computationally demanding. In this paper, we propose an interpolation-free method for FME based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). Our proposed method is implemented in HEVC reference software (HM-16.9). According to our results, ANNs can accomplish FME task with an average increase of 2.6% in BDRate and an average reduction of 0.09 dB in BD-PSNR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207