MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909251905 · doi:10.1109/tcc.2019.2893228

Computing-Aware Base Station Sleeping Mechanism in H-CRAN-Cloud-Edge Networks

2019· article· en· W2909251905 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Alnoman, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceBase stationServerEdge computingComputer networkMobile edge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDistributed computingKnapsack problemAlgorithmOperating systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a power minimization problem using base station sleeping is proposed for heterogeneous cloud radio access networks (H-CRANs) taking into account the computing delay constraints. In the proposed system, which is modeled using M/M/k queues, the edge device coexists with the small base station (SBS) to provide computing capabilities beside the central cloud. In general, the SBS sleeping is governed by the availability of resources provided the macro base station (MBS) which is in charge of accommodating offloaded users from sleeping SBSs. However, switching off lightly loaded SBSs can impose significant burdens on cloud servers. Here, the proposed sleeping scheme allows SBSs serving more computing tasks to remain active in order to fulfill the task completion deadlines requested by mobile users and to keep the cloud response time within a predefined limit. In other words, the proposed scheme aims to save power by undertaking a centralized selection of active and sleeping SBSs taking into account the delay constraints of both cloud and mobile devices. First, we consider a disjoint cloud-edge system, where computing services can be provided by either the cloud or the edge device, and aim to minimize the number of active SBSs. The problem is formulated as a 0-1 knapsack problem with SBS utilization considered as the weight while the ratio of computing tasks to all incoming tasks is considered as the value of that SBS. In this problem, which is solved using dynamic programming, SBSs processing less computing tasks are given higher values; and as a result, higher chance to sleep compared to others. Second, a shared computing system is proposed whereby active SBSs (edge devices) contribute to the total computing capability. Here, an exhaustive search approach is used to achieve the optimal power saving. We also proved that the shared computing system performs better in terms of response time compared to the disjoint system depending on the number of active SBSs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cloud ComputingSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207