40 ans après, qu’en est-il de la loi 101 ? Représentations et discours conflictuels dans la presse québécoise
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S'il est indniable que la Charte de la langue franaise (loi 101) a jou un rle fondamental dans l'histoire du Qubec, elle fait encore aujourd'hui l'objet de nombreuses controverses. Entre en vigueur en aot 1977, la loi 101 a rcemment ft ses 40 ans, ce qui n'est pas pass sous silence dans les mdias. Cet article porte sur les reprsentations qui entourent la loi 101 et qui ont t vhicules l'occasion de cet anniversaire dans la presse crite qubcoise francophone et anglophone. L'analyse de ce corpus, provenant de mdias qui s'adressent des communauts linguistiques diffrentes et des lecteurs partageant des points de vue politiques divergents, permettra de faire ressortir non seulement les diffrents regards ports sur la lgislation linguistique qubcoise l'heure actuelle, mais galement la faon dont ces points de vue antagonistes sont hirarchiss les uns par rapport aux autres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it