MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910846811 · doi:10.1117/1.jrs.13.014505

Detection of marginal ice zone in Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery using curvelet-based features: a case study on the Canadian East Coast

2019· article· en· W2910846811 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jiange Liu, Katharine Scott, Paul Fieguth

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Remote Sensing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarGeologyRemote sensingRadar imagingCurveletInverse synthetic aperture radarLidarSide looking airborne radarRadarArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceContinuous-wave radar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring the marginal ice zone (MIZ) is becoming increasingly important due to recent evidence that the width of the MIZ is changing with climate. A method to automatically detect the MIZ in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery is proposed. The method utilizes the curve-like features of MIZ in SAR images. A multiscale strategy, the curvelet transform, is chosen to extract features from the SAR images. The statistical and co-occurrence features of curvelet coefficients at an appropriate scale are used to identify the MIZ from open water and consolidated ice. Experimental results show a significant increase in classification accuracy (89.7%) compared with the most commonly used MIZ definition from passive microwave sea ice concentration (74%), especially in the diffuse MIZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Remote SensingSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207