MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910846811 · doi:10.1117/1.jrs.13.014505

Detection of marginal ice zone in Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery using curvelet-based features: a case study on the Canadian East Coast

2019· article· en· W2910846811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Remote Sensing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarGeologyRemote sensingRadar imagingCurveletInverse synthetic aperture radarLidarSide looking airborne radarRadarArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceContinuous-wave radar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring the marginal ice zone (MIZ) is becoming increasingly important due to recent evidence that the width of the MIZ is changing with climate. A method to automatically detect the MIZ in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery is proposed. The method utilizes the curve-like features of MIZ in SAR images. A multiscale strategy, the curvelet transform, is chosen to extract features from the SAR images. The statistical and co-occurrence features of curvelet coefficients at an appropriate scale are used to identify the MIZ from open water and consolidated ice. Experimental results show a significant increase in classification accuracy (89.7%) compared with the most commonly used MIZ definition from passive microwave sea ice concentration (74%), especially in the diffuse MIZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it