MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Meta-heurísticas GRASP e BRKGA aplicadas ao problema da diversidade máxima

2017· dissertation· gl· W2911022377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagegl
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)Adidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGRASPMetaheuristicMathematical optimizationPath (computing)SortingHeuristicsMathematicsBenchmark (surveying)Local search (optimization)Set (abstract data type)Function (biology)Fitness landscapeGreedy randomized adaptive search procedureComputer scienceAlgorithmGreedy algorithmPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we study the Maximum Diversity Problem (MDP), which consists of selecting among a set of elements, a subset as diverse as possible. The problem is classified as NP-hard. We present the quadratic and mixed integer linear formulations, applications and numerical example. We solve small problems exactly and we note that for larger problems it is necessary to use heuristics or metaheuristics on its resolution. Therefore, we chose Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP) and Biased Random-Key Genetic Algorithm (BRKGA) metaheuristics to be applied to the MDP. In GRASP, we adopted a solution construction by selecting the element according to its corresponding contribution to the objective function value. After the construction of each solution, we apply a local search and then we activate the path relinking technique. In the local search procedure, we used a exhaustive search, making the best exchange between an element which belongs to solution and another element that does not belong. Once the solutions were generated, we apply path relinking in the expectation that between each pair of solutions, there is a solution with better objective function value. In BRKGA, we implemented a fitness function and a solution decoder adapted to the Maximum Diversity Problem. The fitness function adopted is the sum of diversities between selected elements e the decoding of solutions is based on sorting random-keys. The objective of this work is to analyze and compare the results obtained by GRASP and BRKGA metaheuristics, having as reference the best results in the literature. The problems analyzed in the computational tests were extracted from the MDPLIB library. We observed that the two metaheuristics showed good results on MDP's resolution, moreover for small and medium sized problems BRKGA obtained better performance than GRASP, while for large problems, GRASP outperforms BRKGA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0090.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it