MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911154219 · doi:10.2514/6.2019-1493

Modeling of the Turbulent Reaction Rate in High-Pressure Flows

2019· article· en· W2911154219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Scitech 2019 Forum · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceComputer scienceMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modeling of turbulence-chemistry-thermodynamic interaction is addressed through an a priori study pf a Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) database representing high-p turbulent combustion. The DNS database consists of simulations of a temporal mixing layer in which a single-step chemical reaction occurs; the results are presented here for a single DNS realization. The potential of the single-conditioned Conditional Source-term Estimate (CSE) approach to model the filtered turbulent reaction rate needed for conducting Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is examined. Evaluations conducted with the mixture fraction as a conditioning variable at two filter widths and with the probability distribution function (PDF) extracted from the DNS database representing the mixture fraction, show that the deviation between the model and template is large and substantially increases with filter width. To address this deviation, the Double-conditioned Source-term Estimate (DCSE) approach is explored with two different second conditioning variables, the first conditioning variable being still the mixture fraction; several filter widths are considered. The first choice of the second conditioning variable is a normalized process variable based on the CO_2 mass fraction and the second choice of the second conditioning variable is a normalized temperature. With each second conditional variable, the DCSE results represent a substantial improvement over CSE, by as much as an order of magnitude when measured by the relative error from the filtered reaction rate. A quantitative test based on a root mean square identifies the reason for the DCSE success compared to CSE, the DCSE is able to reduce the departure of the fluctuations of the modeled reaction rate from the filtered reaction rate over the entire range of the filtered reaction rate values. Comparing the DCSE results obtained with the two second conditioning variables, it appears that the normalized process variable based on the CO_2 mass fraction as the second conditioning variable is more successful than the normalized temperature in modeling the filtered reaction rate over its entire range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it