Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS) conference series brings together researchers from around the world to share the latest advances in the field. It provides a highprofile and high-quality forum for research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS 2002, the first of the series, was held in Bologna, followed by Melbourne (2003), New York (2004), Utrecht (2005), Hakodate (2006), Honolulu (2007), Estoril (2008), Budapest (2009), Toronto (2010), Taipei (2011), Valencia (2012), and Saint Paul (2013). This volume constitutes the proceedings of AAMAS 2014, the thirteenth conference in the series, held in Paris in May 2014. In line with previous editions, AAMAS 2014 attracted submissions for a general track and four special tracks: robotics, virtual agents, innovative applications, and a challenges and visions track. The special tracks were chaired by leaders in their corresponding fields: Noa Agmon and Luiz Chaimowicz chaired the robotics track, Elisabeth Andre and Sarit Kraus the virtual agents track, Tom Holvoet and Rajiv Maheswaran the innovative applications track, and Munindar Singh the challenges and visions track. The special track chairs worked with Program Committee Members (PC), Senior Program Committee (SPC) members, and the Program Chairs to select the papers submitted to the special tracks. Full paper (8 pages), challenges and vision (4 pages), and extended abstract (2 pages) submissions were solicited for AAMAS 2014. The papers were selected by means of a thorough review and discussion process, which included an opportunity for authors to respond to reviewer comments. All SPC members followed and contributed to the technical discussions on the papers they were overseeing and participated in a conference call with the program chairs, where each paper in their allocation was discussed. In addition to this, the special track chairs held conference calls with the program chairs to further discuss the papers in the special tracks. Full papers were presented orally in 20 minute slots; all full papers and extended abstracts were presented as posters during the conference. Out of the 709 submissions, 425 (60%) had a student as the primary author, 86 of these were accepted as full papers (12%), and a further 109 (15%) were accepted as extended abstracts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it