MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912390776 · doi:10.2118/194329-ms

Utilization of Far Field Diverters to Mitigate Parent and Infill Well Fracture Interaction in Shale Formations

2019· article· en· W2912390776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsInfillOil shaleHydraulic fracturingGeologyFracture (geology)Petroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydraulic fracturing treatments in shale infill wells are often impacted by existing parent well depletion and asymmetrical fracture growth. These phenomena can result in excessive load water production, deposition of proppant and deformation of casing in the parent well, and unbalanced stimulation of infill wells. This study determines the effectiveness of particulate materials for mitigating the above negative outcomes by bridging near the extremities of dominant fracture wings, i.e., far field diverting agents. Fracture propagation was modeled to characterize the width profile at fracture extremities in a depleted stress environment. A slotted-disk device was used to evaluate and optimize particulate blends for bridging slots representative of width near the fracture tip. Rheological tests replicating the downhole environment were used to formulate a system for transporting the diverting materials. Statistical analysis of 511 fracture hits at 30 parent wells was performed on key treatment indicators by the category of diverter type and post-hit parent well condition. Production trends of the influenced wells were compared to area-specific type curves and offset wells without diverter trials. Based on the simulation and testing results, two types of high-graded far field diverter systems were field tested in a shale play: dissolvable, extremely fine particulate mixed with 100 mesh sand, and mixtures of nominal 325 mesh silica flour and 100 mesh sand. Proppant dust collected at the fracturing site was also evaluated for replacing commercial silica flour. High-graded blends of the above diverting systems demonstrated superior frac-hit and productivity metrics as compared to the base case of not applying far field diverters. The silica flour and 100 mesh sand mixture performed on par with the significantly more expensive blend of dissolvable fine particulate and 100 mesh sand. Guar borate crosslinked gel was an effective carrying fluid for transporting diverting materials to the fracture extremities. Statistical analysis of fracture hit events shows that the application of far field diverters did not reduce the magnitude of pressure buildups during fracture hits; however, it significantly increases the post-hit pressure falloff rate at the parent wells. Based on the area-specific type curves, pumping far field diverters increased the P50 EUR by about 6% compared with the base cases of not applying diverters. For all the wells impacted by far field diverters, the infill wells saw larger benefits with an increment of P50 EUR by about 7% compared with the parent wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it