MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912724935 · doi:10.1177/1729881418825407

Position deceptive tracking controller and parameters analysis via error characteristics for unmanned aerial vehicle

2019· article· en· W2912724935 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yan Guo, Meiping Wu, Kanghua Tang, Junbo Tie, Jingyu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of CalgaryU.S. Department of Homeland Security
KeywordsComputer scienceOffset (computer science)Position (finance)Controller (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Position errorSpoofing attackTracking (education)Tracking errorPath (computing)Real-time computingArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Orientation (vector space)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covert Global Navigation Satellite System spoofer, called position deceptive tracking controller for unmanned aerial vehicle, is studied via analyzing the error characteristics in this article. Specifically, the following topics are discussed: (1) design the position deceptive tracking controller to make unmanned aerial vehicle deviate from the original path and follow up the spoofed new path point by point, and (2) analyze the related parameters by exploring the characteristics of the initial estimated state errors. Simulation results show the designed controller can realize the position offset of unmanned aerial vehicle unknowingly. What’s more, it can eliminate the initial state errors by selecting appropriate parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Robotic SystemsSame topicGuidance and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207