MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913155314 · doi:10.1177/1464884919825503

Intersecting violence: Representations of Somali youth in the Canadian press

2019· article· en· W2913155314 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomaliRadicalizationImmigrationCriminologyGender studiesNarrativeRepresentation (politics)TerrorismSociologyPolitical scienceHistoryLawArtPoliticsLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the press coverage accorded to Canadian youth of Somali origin in the Canadian press using two methodological procedures. Charting the representational clusters that cohere around Canadian Black male youth of Somali heritage reveals the circulation of stereotypical tropes that are mostly circumscribed within the framework of crime, terrorism, and violence, reflecting the intersection of stereotypes commonly ascribed to Muslims and to Black males. In the case of the Canadian Somali youth, this representation encompasses major narratives such as ‘radicalization and terror’, ‘immigration and belonging’, ‘surveillance and safety’, and ‘gang violence’ and, to a lesser extent, positive stories. To corroborate the first level of analysis, the computational analyses reveal four main topics and associations that are similar to the above findings, providing insight into the way Canadian Somali youth, especially men, are facing different challenges in their lived experiences in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it