MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913176636 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaa221

A Non-commutative Fejér Theorem for Crossed Products, the Approximation Property, and Applications

2020· preprint· en· W2913176636 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Crann, Matthias Neufang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLocally compact spaceCommutative propertyPure mathematicsVon Neumann architectureApproximation propertyFubini's theoremLocally compact groupGroup (periodic table)Property (philosophy)Product (mathematics)Banach spaceDynamical systems theorySpace (punctuation)Discrete mathematicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We prove that a locally compact group has the approximation property (AP), introduced by Haagerup–Kraus [ 21], if and only if a non-commutative Fejér theorem holds for its associated $C^*$- or von Neumann crossed products. As applications, we answer three open problems in the literature. Specifically, we show that any locally compact group with the AP is exact. This generalizes a result by Haagerup–Kraus [ 21] and answers a problem raised by Li [ 27]. We also answer a question of Bédos–Conti [ 4] on the Fejér property of discrete $C^*$-dynamical systems, as well as a question by Anoussis–Katavolos–Todorov [ 3] for all locally compact groups with the AP. In our approach, we develop a notion of Fubini crossed product for locally compact groups and a dynamical version of the slice map property.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.233
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207