MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913653111 · doi:10.14428/rcompro.v0i7.18313

Liberté et précarité comme nouvelles valeurs ?

2019· article· fr· W2913653111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Communication & professionnalisation · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les transformations contemporaines traversant les sphères professionnelles de la communication, et se construisant notamment autour du numérique, paraissent nombreuses et potentiellement de grande ampleur, bien qu’il demeure difficile d’en délimiter les contours avec certitude. Dans ces métiers, les conditions d’emploi et les conditions de travail changent graduellement, non sans faire écho à des changements touchant l’ensemble des sociétés, et semblent s’accompagner de réactions diverses, parfois équivoques de la part des différentes catégories d’acteurs. Dans cet article, nous interrogeons les métiers de la communication comme résistances, reflets et accélérations de ces transformations qui les dépassent, afin d’aborder trois propositions principales de travail : le transfert de responsabilités – économiques comme éthiques – à la charge des travailleurs et travailleuses ; la construction de la flexibilité comme idéal au sein d’un entrepreneuriat de soi ; la déstabilisation des carrières au profit d’une mise en avant d’une valeur ajoutée à l’offre de travail. Ensemble, ces mutations au sein des sphères de la communication apparaissent comme une traduction, à la fois reprise et interprétation spécifique, des exigences du capitalisme néolibéral. Contemporary transformations of labour in the different professional spheres of communication, which are increasingly taking ground in the digital landscape, appear to be emerging on a potentially large scale, although the precise nature and forms of these transformations remain to be studied more closely. Working conditions and modes of employment are gradually changing, echoing larger societal trends, and are met with different, sometimes equivocal reactions. In this article, we look at communication work as a site where these transformations are reflected, resisted and accelerated. We formulate three research avenues: 1) a transfer of responsibility – both of an economic and ethical nature – from the organisations to the workers; 2) the presentation of flexibility as a new ideal in a movement favouring self-entrepreneurship; 3) a destabilization of careers and employment trajectories that puts forward the need for workers to demonstrate their added value and expertise. We argue that, taken together, these transformations that are taking place in communication spheres of work can be considered as translations – both picking up and offering specific interpretations of – neoliberal capitalism and its pressures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it