Liberté et précarité comme nouvelles valeurs ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les transformations contemporaines traversant les sphères professionnelles de la communication, et se construisant notamment autour du numérique, paraissent nombreuses et potentiellement de grande ampleur, bien qu’il demeure difficile d’en délimiter les contours avec certitude. Dans ces métiers, les conditions d’emploi et les conditions de travail changent graduellement, non sans faire écho à des changements touchant l’ensemble des sociétés, et semblent s’accompagner de réactions diverses, parfois équivoques de la part des différentes catégories d’acteurs. Dans cet article, nous interrogeons les métiers de la communication comme résistances, reflets et accélérations de ces transformations qui les dépassent, afin d’aborder trois propositions principales de travail : le transfert de responsabilités – économiques comme éthiques – à la charge des travailleurs et travailleuses ; la construction de la flexibilité comme idéal au sein d’un entrepreneuriat de soi ; la déstabilisation des carrières au profit d’une mise en avant d’une valeur ajoutée à l’offre de travail. Ensemble, ces mutations au sein des sphères de la communication apparaissent comme une traduction, à la fois reprise et interprétation spécifique, des exigences du capitalisme néolibéral. Contemporary transformations of labour in the different professional spheres of communication, which are increasingly taking ground in the digital landscape, appear to be emerging on a potentially large scale, although the precise nature and forms of these transformations remain to be studied more closely. Working conditions and modes of employment are gradually changing, echoing larger societal trends, and are met with different, sometimes equivocal reactions. In this article, we look at communication work as a site where these transformations are reflected, resisted and accelerated. We formulate three research avenues: 1) a transfer of responsibility – both of an economic and ethical nature – from the organisations to the workers; 2) the presentation of flexibility as a new ideal in a movement favouring self-entrepreneurship; 3) a destabilization of careers and employment trajectories that puts forward the need for workers to demonstrate their added value and expertise. We argue that, taken together, these transformations that are taking place in communication spheres of work can be considered as translations – both picking up and offering specific interpretations of – neoliberal capitalism and its pressures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".