MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913715231 · doi:10.1142/s021945541950055x

A New Damage Index for Isolated Structures

2019· article· en· W2913715231 on OpenAlexaff
Niloofar Elyasi, Faramarz Khoshnoudian, Yasaman Khoshnoudian

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Structural engineeringPrincipal component analysisStructural health monitoringComputer scienceFrame (networking)Base (topology)MathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Damage indices based on structural dynamic characteristics are often used to detect damage in the structures. In this study, a new index for identifying damages in base-isolated structures is proposed using the frequency response function (FRF). Since calculation of the FRF data is time- and memory-consuming for problems of large size, the two-dimensional principal component analysis technique is employed to decrease the data size. The damage indices calculated, representing the health state of the structure, are stored in a database, which are then used to detect the damage location and severity by utilizing the lookup table method. The proposed damage detection method is applied to four concrete frame models, one of which is fixed at the base and the others are isolated by elastomeric bearings. The FRF data are polluted with three different noise values (5%, 10% and 15%) in order to evaluate the uncertainty of measurements. The accuracy of the proposed indices is compared with each other for various parameters such as noise values, bearings characteristics, base conditions and different damage scenarios. The results show the precision of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and DynamicsSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207