Dynamic Asymmetric Effects of Cross-Media Exposures over the Purchase Cycle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>ABSTRACT</h3> Cross-media advertising campaigns can grant marketers decisive advantages given the potential for synergy. Little is known, however, about the dynamics of cross-media effects due to the evolution of household demand over the purchase cycle as well as the potential for asymmetry in such effects due to sequential exposure. More remains to be learned about such effects in the emerging Chinese market, which may exhibit regional variation. The authors studied the dynamic effects of cross-media advertising on television and online over the household purchase cycle, examining single-source data on household-level cross-media exposures and purchases for a brand of a consumer packaged goods (CPG) in China. They found evidence for dynamic synergistic effects, which exhibited asymmetry in the direction of television advertising. They also found evidence for regional variation in cross-media response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it