MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914332715 · doi:10.1177/105678791602500103

The 21st-Century School Library

2016· article· en· W2914332715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Educational Reform · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb and Library Services
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital libraryMobile deviceState (computer science)Digital transformationOrder (exchange)Mobile technologyEmerging technologiesInformation technologyInstitutionWorld Wide WebLibrary scienceComputer scienceSociologyBusinessSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Libraries have always been an institution in a state of transformation and change. Today this state of change has mainly been brought on by rapid advances of networked digital information technology. The purpose of this literature review is to explore and illuminate current library research and trends, including transformations in the library landscape, impacts on users and higher education, the opportunities and challenges facing libraries, the use of new technologies such as mobile devices, and the dual role of the librarian. Libraries need to be reshaped in order to compete with online technologies and to stay relevant in the 21st century. Recommended areas for further research include ways to gauge user interest, new qualifications for librarians, and the increasing use of mobile technology to access library collections and services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it