A decomposition-based heuristic for large employee scheduling problems with inter-department transfers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a personalized employee scheduling problem with characteristics present in retail stores consisting of multiple departments. In the setting under study, each department generally covers its demand in employees over the planning horizon of a week by assigning shifts to its own staff. However, the employees can also be transferred to other departments under certain conditions for executing entire shifts or parts of shifts there. The transfer feature enables to improve the overall schedule quality considerably when compared to the nontransfer case. Given the complexity of the problem, we propose a three-phase decomposition-based heuristic. In the first phase, we consider each department separately and solve a simplified version of the mono-department scheduling problems. From the obtained solutions, we deduce inter-department shifts that could potentially reduce the overall cost. This is examined in the second phase by resolving the scheduling problem of the first phase where the deduced inter-department shifts are included. In this phase, however, we decompose the scheduling problem by time, looking at each day separately. From the obtained schedules, we then devise inter-department demand curves, which specify the number of transfers between departments over time. In the third phase, we decompose the initial scheduling problem into mono-department problems using these inter-department demand curves. Consequently, our approach makes it possible to solve mono-department optimization problems to get an overall schedule while still benefiting from the employee transfer feature. In all three phases, the scheduling problems are formulated as mixed-integer linear programs. We show through extensive computational experiments on instances with up to 25 departments and 1000 employees that the method provides high-quality solutions within reasonable computation times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it