MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915237405 · doi:10.1080/07474938.2022.2140982

Hamiltonian sequential Monte Carlo with application to consumer choice behavior

2023· article· en· W2915237405 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconometric Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMarkov chain Monte CarloParticle filterMonte Carlo methodComputer scienceHybrid Monte CarloBayesian inferenceRandom walkNonparametric statisticsScalabilityBayesian probabilityAlgorithmStatistical physicsMathematical optimizationEconometricsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsKalman filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The practical use of nonparametric Bayesian methods requires the availability of efficient algorithms for posterior inference. The inherently serial nature of traditional Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods imposes limitations on their efficiency and scalability. In recent years, there has been a surge of research activity devoted to developing alternative implementation methods that target parallel computing environments. Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC), also known as a particle filter, has been gaining popularity due to its desirable properties. SMC uses a genetic mutation-selection sampling approach with a set of particles representing the posterior distribution of a stochastic process. We propose to enhance the performance of SMC by utilizing Hamiltonian transition dynamics in the particle transition phase, in place of random walk used in the previous literature. We call the resulting procedure Hamiltonian Sequential Monte Carlo (HSMC). Hamiltonian transition dynamics have been shown to yield superior mixing and convergence properties relative to random walk transition dynamics in the context of MCMC procedures. The rationale behind HSMC is to translate such gains to the SMC environment. HSMC will facilitate practical estimation of models with complicated latent structures, such as nonparametric individual unobserved heterogeneity, that are otherwise difficult to implement. We demonstrate the behavior of HSMC in a challenging simulation study and contrast its favorable performance with SMC and other alternative approaches. We then apply HSMC to a panel discrete choice model with nonparametric consumer heterogeneity, allowing for multiple modes, asymmetries, and data-driven clustering, providing insights for consumer segmentation, individual level marketing, and price micromanagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it