MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916492277 · doi:10.1097/shk.0000000000001332

Heparin-Binding Protein as a Prognostic Biomarker of Sepsis and Disease Severity at the Emergency Department

2019· article· en· W2916492277 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fredrik Kahn, Jonas Tverring, Lisa Mellhammar, Nils Wetterberg, Anna Bläckberg, Erika Studahl, Niklas Hadorn, Robin Kahn, Susanne Nueesch, Philipp Jent, Meret E. Ricklin, John H. Boyd, Bértil Christensson, Parham Sendi, Per Åkesson, Adam Linder

Bibliographic record

VenueShock · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentOrgan dysfunctionSepsisProspective cohort studyBiomarkerIntensive care unitOxygen saturationInternal medicineEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Rapid and early detection of patients at risk to develop sepsis remains demanding. Heparin-binding protein (HBP) has previously demonstrated good prognostic properties in detecting organ dysfunction among patients with suspected infections. This study aimed to evaluate the plasma levels of HBP as a prognostic biomarker for infection-induced organ dysfunction among patients seeking medical attention at the emergency department. DESIGN: Prospective, international multicenter, convenience sample study. SETTING: Four general emergency departments at academic centers in Sweden, Switzerland, and Canada. PATIENTS: All emergency encounters among adults where one of the following criteria were fulfilled: respiratory rate >25 breaths per minute; heart rate >120 beats per minute; altered mental status; systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg; oxygen saturation <90% without oxygen; oxygen saturation <93% with oxygen; reported oxygen saturation <90%. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 524 emergency department patients were prospectively enrolled, of these 236 (45%) were eventually adjudicated to have a noninfectious disease. Three hundred forty-seven patients (66%) had or developed organ dysfunction within 72 h, 54 patients (10%) were admitted to an intensive care unit, and 23 patients (4%) died within 72 h. For the primary outcome, detection of infected-related organ dysfunction within 72 h, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for HBP was 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.78) among all patients and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.87) among patients confidently adjudicated to either infection or no infection. Against the secondary outcome, infection leading to admittance to the ICU, death or a persistent high SOFA-score due to an infection (SOFA-score ≥5 at 12-24 h) HBP had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95) among all patients and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) among patients confidently adjudicated to either infection or noninfection. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at the emergency department, HBP demonstrated good prognostic and discriminatory properties in detecting the most severely ill patients with infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShockSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207