MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918027066 · doi:10.5539/jel.v8n2p37

Promoting Self-Learning and Autonomy with the Use of ICT in Higher Education Through Projects Close to Professional Practice

2019· article· en· W2918027066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carlos R. Jaimez-González, Wulfrano Arturo Luna-Ramírez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Learning · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyCurriculumInformation and Communications TechnologyAppropriationProfessional developmentProcess (computing)PedagogySociologyPsychologyMathematics educationKnowledge managementComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an academic experience about the incorporation and appropriation of various ICT in four courses of the undergraduate program in Information Technologies and Systems of the Metropolitan Autonomous University in Mexico. These courses present students’ situations close to professional practice by performing a specific role to solve problems in a particular area or project. They aim to develop the capabilities of integration and use of knowledge and skills that students have acquired in the curriculum. The paper presents the organization and structure of the courses, their content, ways of conducting and evaluation, as well as some examples of projects that have been supervised by the authors. It also describes in detail the process of conducting a project carried out with students, the ICTs that were incorporated and the possibility of innovation that the teacher has by managing these types of projects. This paper also shows the potential of the courses in the training of students, by promoting autonomy with the use of ICT, involving them in the improvement of their skills for the analysis and use of information, and fostering self-learning through situations and experiences close to their professional practice. Additionally, this experience reinforced students’ critical thinking by promoting the ability to judge different software products, as it allowed them to identify problems and find their solutions, become familiar with programming languages ​​and develop their oral and written communication skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.015
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education and LearningSame topicE-Learning and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207