MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918458045

iCity: big data and visualization urban transportation strategies

2018· article· en· W2918458045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Science and Software Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsEsri (Canada)University of SaskatchewanUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransportation planningComputer scienceBig dataSustainable transportVisualizationUrban planningTransport engineeringIntelligent transportation systemData scienceEngineeringSustainabilityArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Providing efficient, cost-effective, sustainable transportation networks and services is a major challenge for cities around the world not only for individual cities, but for connectivity between cities. High quality transportation services, notably well-designed transit hubs within comprehensive networks are fundamental prerequisites for effective cities and spur economic, social and cultural inclusion, development and growth. Transportation strategies must be at the heart of smart city strategies. The melding of machine learning, simulations, predictive analytics and design create capacity and connectivity that will help policy and makers gain insight into complex decision-making processes and support evidence-based decision making. Solving transportation and transit challenges requires integrating transdisciplinary knowledge, including computer science, engineering into city planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it