MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2919377922 · doi:10.1289/isee.2016.4246

A Randomized Controlled Trial of HEPA Filter Air Cleaner Use and Fetal Growth in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2016· article· en· W2919377922 on OpenAlexaff
Prabjit Barn, Enkhjargal Gombojav, Chimedsuren Оchir, Bayarkhuu Legtseg, Jargalsaikhan Galsuren, Buyantushig Boldbaatar, Bolor Beejin, Tsogtbaatar Byambaa, Craig R. Janes, Patricia A. Janssen, Bruce P. Lanphear, Tim K. Takaro, Scott A. Venners, Glenys M. Webster, Ryan W. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of WaterlooSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHEPAGestational ageBirth weightRandomized controlled trialAir purifierGestationPregnancyLow birth weightObstetricsPediatricsSurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposures may impair fetal growth. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of portable HEPA filter air cleaners to reduce fetal growth restriction among non-smoking pregnant women in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, where residential coal use leads to high ambient PM2.5 concentrations. Methods: We randomly assigned 540 women to an intervention (1-2 air cleaners) or control (no air cleaners) group. One-week continuous PM2.5 measurements were made at approximately 12 and 30 weeks gestation. Housing, maternal health, and birth outcome (weight, length, head circumference, and gestational age) data were obtained via questionnaires and clinical records. We used linear regression to examine the efficacy of the intervention on birth outcomes for all live births (n=463) and term births (n=424), adjusting for gestational age, sex and parity, in an intention-to-treat analysis. Results: Based on 690 PM2.5 measurements, the geometric mean (GSD) concentration was 26 % lower in intervention homes [35 (2) vs. 47 (2) µg/m3]. The mean (SD) birth weight, birth length, and head circumference were 3457 (545) g, 51 (3) cm, and 35 (2) cm, respectively, among all live births and there were no differences by group assignment. In adjusted models of all births, the intervention did not result in a significant difference in birth weight (49 g; 95% CI: -27, 125 g; p=0.20), birth length (0.2 cm; 95% CI: -0.2. 0.6 cm; p=0.24), or head circumference (0.1 cm; 95% CI: -0.2, 0.4 cm; p=0.67). Among term births, the intervention resulted in a marginally significant increase in birth weight [68 g (95% CI: -5, 142 g; p=0.07] and a 0.4 cm increase in birth length (95% CI: 0.04, 0.7 cm; p=0.03). Conclusion: HEPA filter air cleaner use during pregnancy in this high pollution setting is associated with improved fetal growth as indicated by greater birth length and birth weight among term births.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207