MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2919962977 · doi:10.24252/jdi.v6i3.6548

METODE FLEKSIBILITAS GURU-GURU PESANTREN DARUD DAKWAH WAL-IRSYAD MANGKOSO DALAM MENCEGAH FAHAM RADIKALISME

2018· article· id· W2919962977 on OpenAlexaff
Qasim Mathar Moch., Mahmuddin Mahmuddin

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Diskursus Islam · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang fleksibilitas guru-guru dalam mencegah faham radikalisme dan sekularisme di kalangan santri Pondok Pesantren DDI Mangkoso Barru. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif kualitatif yang dilaksanakan pada Pondok Pesantren DDI Mangkoso Barru. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan multi disipliner yang mencakup pendekatan spiritual, psikologis, pedagogis, yuridis, fenomenologis, dan historis. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah pimpinan pondok pesantren, kepala kampus, wakil kepala kampus, kepala madrasah, wakil kepala madrasah, guru akidah akhlak, pembina asrama, profil pesantren, data tenaga pendidik dan kependidikan serta data santri. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Instrumen penelitian adalah peneliti sendiri sebagai key instrumen, artinya peneliti sendiri sebagai instrumen kunci dan penelitian disesuaikan dengan metode yang digunakan. Penulis menggunakan satu jenis instrumen yaitu; “Pedoman Wawancara”. Pengolahan dan analisis data mengikuti teori Miles dan Huberman, melalui tiga tahap, yaitu reduksi data, penyajian data (display data) dan verifikasi data atau penarikan kesimpulan. Pengecekan keabsahan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ada tiga macam, yaitu triangulasi sumber, triangulasi teknik, dan triangulasi waktu. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa fleksibilitas guru-guru pondok pesantren DDI Mangkoso pada dasarnya mendukung semua asumsi dasar dari faham konstruktivisme. Yang menjadi alatnya atau media untuk mengaplikasikan teori fleksibilitas, agar bisa memberikan pengalaman realistis yang berbeda dan otentik kepada setiap individu dalam menangkal faham radikalisme dikalangan santri pesantren DDI Mangkoso, yang peniliti temukan di lapangan adalah guru-guru pondok pesantren DDI Mangkoso dalam melaksanakan kegiatan pembelajaran, ilmu-ilmu ushul yang menjadi kompotensi utama diajarkan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Diskursus IslamSame topicIslamic Studies and RadicalismFrench-language works237,207