MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920295506

Ischemic stroke detection using EEG signals

2018· article· en· W2920295506 on OpenAlexaff
Arooj Ahmed Qureshi, Canxiu Zhang, Rong Zheng, Ahmed Elmeligi

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Science and Software Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyComputer scienceStroke (engine)Gold standard (test)Decision treeWearable computerArtificial intelligenceMultilayer perceptronIschemic strokePattern recognition (psychology)Magnetic resonance imagingArtificial neural networkMedicineCardiologyIschemiaInternal medicineRadiologyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stroke is the second leading cause of death in the United States of America. 87% of all strokes are ischemic stroke, which is mainly caused by the blockage of small blood vessels around the brain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides the gold standard for accurate diagnosis of ischemic strokes, but it is both time-consuming and unsuitable for 24/7 monitoring. In this paper, we propose an ischemic stroke detection method through the multi-domain analysis of EEG brain signal from wearable EEG devices and machine learning. Using 40 healthy and 40 patients' data, we find that Multi-Layered Perceptron (MLP) and Bootstrap models (Extra-Tree and Decision-Tree) can achieve test accuracy of 95% with an area under the ROC curve 0.85.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Science and Software EngineeringSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207