MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920754862 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2018.8645432

Multi-Layer Linear Processing for Uplink Massive MIMO Systems in the Presence of Unequal-Power Co-Channel Interferers

2018· article· en· W2920754862 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2018 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOTelecommunications linkChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceAntenna (radio)Layer (electronics)Power (physics)Maximal-ratio combiningRange (aeronautics)Computational complexity theoryPhysical layerAlgorithmComputer engineeringElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessFadingEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel multi-layer linear receiver for massive MIMO systems that can provide a range of complexity/ performance trade-offs. The proposed method consists of splitting the antenna array into a number of subsets of size greater than all users, which is further divided into smaller subsets. Then, optimum combining (OC) is applied on each subset in a first layer. The outputs are combined using OC again at a second layer. Finally, the resulting outputs are combined using maximal-ratio combining (MRC). This design is inspired by our previous work which proposes to implement two layer processors to achieve a good trade-off between performance and complexity. Simulation results show that our method approaches the performance of a conventional OC combiner, albeit with significantly reduced complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it