The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to a report from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators,1GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016.N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 2429-2437Crossref PubMed Scopus (634) Google Scholar the estimated global lifetime risk of stroke in 2016 for those aged 25 years or older was 24·9%, an increase from 22·8% in 1990. The estimate includes an almost equal risk of stroke among women and men, and an 18·3% risk of ischaemic stroke and 8·2% risk of haemorrhagic stroke.1GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016.N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 2429-2437Crossref PubMed Scopus (634) Google Scholar Furthermore, the lifetime risk varies by Socio-demographic Index (SDI; 23·5% for high SDI, 31·1% for high-middle SDI, and 13·2% for low SDI countries); the low risk in the low SDI group is attributed to the high numbers of competing causes of mortality. Additionally, the prevalence of stroke is expected to increase. In a policy statement crafted by an American Heart Association working group, it was concluded that, by 2030, almost 4% of US adults will have had a stroke, accounting for total direct annual stroke-related medical costs increasing from US$71·55 billion in 2012 to $183·13 billion by 2030.2Ovbiagele B Goldstein LB Higashida RT et al.Forecasting the future of stroke in the United States : a policy statement from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association.Stroke. 2013; 44: 2361-2375Crossref PubMed Scopus (485) Google Scholar Driving the upswing in stroke prevalence rates is a projected increase in stroke attributed to a growing and ageing population and lower stroke case fatality rates associated with better acute ischaemic stroke care and improved recurrent stroke prevention strategies.2Ovbiagele B Goldstein LB Higashida RT et al.Forecasting the future of stroke in the United States : a policy statement from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association.Stroke. 2013; 44: 2361-2375Crossref PubMed Scopus (485) Google Scholar These findings point to the importance of continued surveillance of stroke case fatality, incidence, and recurrence rates.1GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016.N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 2429-2437Crossref PubMed Scopus (634) Google Scholar, 2Ovbiagele B Goldstein LB Higashida RT et al.Forecasting the future of stroke in the United States : a policy statement from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association.Stroke. 2013; 44: 2361-2375Crossref PubMed Scopus (485) Google Scholar In The Lancet Neurology, the GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators3GBD 2016 Stroke CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.Lancet Neurol. 2019; 48: 439-458Google Scholar provide a systematic analysis of the global, regional, and national burden of stroke from 1990 to 2016 in terms of incidence, prevalence, deaths, years lived with disability, years of life lost, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Improvements on previous GBD stroke estimates include new approaches to collect inpatient hospital data, extension of the oldest age group for study (up to 95 years or older), a more comprehensive literature review, and the addition of expected values for all measures on the basis of socioeconomic development. Notably, stroke remains the second leading cause of death worldwide, with 5·5 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 5·3–5·7) deaths attributed to this cause in 2016. Fewer women (2·6 million [2·5–2·7]) than men (2·9 million [2·8–3·0]) died from stroke.3GBD 2016 Stroke CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.Lancet Neurol. 2019; 48: 439-458Google Scholar Deaths due to ischaemic stroke were slightly less frequent than those due to haemorrhagic stroke. Stroke was also the second most common cause of DALYs. The highest incidence of stroke occurred in east Asia, followed by the eastern European region, whereas the lowest rates were in central Latin America. Women and men had similar age-specific incidences at ages up to 55 years, but the rates were greater in men at 55–75 years, levelling out at ages older than 75 years. Most of the stroke burden was attributable to risks measured in GBD. For example, metabolic factors (high systolic blood pressure, body-mass index, fasting plasma glucose, and total cholesterol and low glomerular filtration rate) accounted for 72% of stroke DALYs, behavioural factors (smoking, poor diet, and physical inactivity) accounted for 66%, and environmental risks (air pollution and lead exposure) accounted for about 28%. Although most of the risk attribution information is not novel, many of the risks are modifiable and have been shown to reduce stroke, and thus, are important to track and emphasise in relation to continued stroke prevention efforts. Despite the reduction in age-standardised stroke death rates and a decrease in stroke incidence in most regions, with the exception of east Asia and southern sub-Saharan Africa, stroke is still prevalent and remains disabling, with more than 80 million stroke survivors worldwide and an increasing absolute number of DALYs. It has become apparent that population growth and ageing have the potential to result in a greater absolute pool of people at risk of stroke and people who will have a stroke, despite the current declining stroke incidence. A forecast in the USA up to year 2050 suggests a doubling of the number of strokes, largely occurring in people aged 75 years and older and in minority ethnic groups such as Hispanic people.5Gorelick PB The future of stroke prevention by risk factor modification.Handb Clin Neurol. 2009; 94: 1261-1276Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Additionally, improved stroke survival portends a higher prevalence of chronic stroke.3GBD 2016 Stroke CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.Lancet Neurol. 2019; 48: 439-458Google Scholar Based on the current forecasts, prevention of stroke in people aged 75 years and older will be an important target to relieve future global burden of stroke. Additionally, we will need to continue to support efforts to prevent stroke by risk factor modification, make stroke prevention available in low-income areas of the world where stroke incidence might be high, and discover novel stroke prevention and rehabilitation strategies.5Gorelick PB The future of stroke prevention by risk factor modification.Handb Clin Neurol. 2009; 94: 1261-1276Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar, 6Feigin VL Krishnamurthi RV Parmar P et al.Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990–2013: the GBD 2013 study.Neuroepidemiology. 2015; 45: 161-176Crossref PubMed Scopus (798) Google Scholar Promotion of a healthy environment, which is often overlooked, also might pay substantial dividends.7Watts N Adger WN Agnolucci P et al.Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health.Lancet. 2015; 386: 1861-1914Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1018) Google Scholar My employer receives payment for work as a major cardiovascular event adjudicator for a number of pharmaceutical companies. I have received personal fees for serving on the Bayer ARRIVE study steering committee, outside the submitted work. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016Although age-standardised mortality rates have decreased sharply from 1990 to 2016, the decrease in age-standardised incidence has been less steep, indicating that the burden of stroke is likely to remain high. Planned updates to future GBD iterations include generating separate estimates for subarachnoid haemorrhage and intracerebral haemorrhage, generating estimates of transient ischaemic attack, and including atrial fibrillation as a risk factor. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it