MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920989721 · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30030-4

The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling

2019· letter· en· W2920989721 on OpenAlexaff
Philip B. Gorelick

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Neurology · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to a report from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators,1 the estimated global lifetime risk of stroke in 2016 for those aged 25 years or older was 24·9%, an increase from 22·8% in 1990. The estimate includes an almost equal risk of stroke among women and men, and an 18·3% risk of ischaemic stroke and 8·2% risk of haemorrhagic stroke.1 Furthermore, the lifetime risk varies by Socio-demographic Index (SDI; 23·5% for high SDI, 31·1% for high-middle SDI, and 13·2% for low SDI countries); the low risk in the low SDI group is attributed to the high numbers of competing causes of mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations625
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet NeurologySame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207