Approximate Reliability Evaluation of Large-Scale Multistate Series-Parallel Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multistate series-parallel system (MSSPS) is a widely used model for representing engineering systems, whose reliability has been extensively analyzed. Universal generating function (UGF) is an efficient method for evaluating the reliability of MSSPS. However, when facing the large-scale MSSPS, where the number of system components and possible states are enormous, calclating the exact system reliability can be rather time-consuming. To evaluate the reliability of large-scale MSSPS more efficiently, this paper proposes an approximation method, named continuization discretization approximation (CDA) method. The CDA approach consists of continuization and discretization processes. The continuization process applies Gaussian approximation method based on the central limit theory and the UGF technique to evaluate parallel subsystems. While the discretization process discretizes the continuous distribution to a discrete one, and proposes an algorithm to evaluate the series subsystems efficiently. The efficiency and accuracy performance of the CDA method can be adjusted by parameters according to the computational resource and the system scale. The newly proposed method is compared to the existing methods in evaluating the large-scale MSSPS. Numerical examples show that the CDA method has evident advantage in computational efficiency with satisfactory accuracy performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it