MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921395671 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ab0fab

A review of manufacturing techniques of smart composite structures with embedded bulk piezoelectric transducers

2019· review· en· W2921395671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorSmart materialPiezoelectricityEmbeddingStructural health monitoringPiezoelectric sensorProcess (computing)TransducerEnergy harvestingComposite numberMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceEnergy (signal processing)Electrical engineeringNanotechnologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Since the mid-1980’s, sensors and actuators have been combined with composite materials in order to enhance and increase the functionalities of the resulting products. These innovative devices are called intelligent, adaptive or smart structures. Their main applications are related but not limited to vibration control, structural health monitoring, shape control and energy harvesting. One possible way of developing these devices is to embed the smart materials inside the structure. In this case, the main challenge is the way of embedding the smart material during the manufacturing process. This review presents the key elements of the manufacturing process, provides an overview of the techniques developed to embed the bulk piezoelectric transducers in the composite and details the achievements made with them. In conclusion, some guidelines for futures researches and developments are proposed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it