An Analytical Approach to Improve Vehicle Maneuverability via Torque Vectoring Control: Theoretical Study and Experimental Validation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To improve the maneuverability of a vehicle and fully leverage the advantages of torque vectoring control (TVC) in improving vehicle dynamics, a method to analytically improve the cornering response based on TVC is proposed in this paper. A feedforward and feedback control architecture based on a two-degree-of-freedom vehicle model is first introduced. An analytical expression of the yaw moment feedforward model is derived under the condition that the transfer function of the ideal yaw rate with respect to the real one is equal to 1. Then, the key influencing factors of the additional yaw moment are investigated in detail. More importantly, the real experimental results under steady and transit state are analyzed to demonstrate how the proposed controller can improve vehicle maneuverability. Experimental results show that the bandwidth of vehicle transient response could be improved by 29.6% in the tests. The controller can be easily extended to any type of TVC even though it is applied to a rear-wheel driven electric vehicle in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it