Hierarchical Density-Based Clustering Using MapReduce
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hierarchical density-based clustering is a powerful tool for exploratory data analysis, which can play an important role in the understanding and organization of datasets. However, its applicability to large datasets is limited because the computational complexity of hierarchical clustering methods has a quadratic lower bound in the number of objects to be clustered. MapReduce is a popular programming model to speed up data mining and machine learning algorithms operating on large, possibly distributed datasets. In the literature, there have been attempts to parallelize algorithms such as Single-Linkage, which in principle can also be extended to the broader scope of hierarchical density-based clustering, but hierarchical clustering algorithms are inherently difficult to parallelize with MapReduce. In this paper, we discuss why adapting previous approaches to parallelize Single-Linkage clustering using MapReduce leads to very inefficient solutions when one wants to compute density-based clustering hierarchies. Preliminarily, we discuss one such solution, which is based on an exact, yet very computationally demanding, random blocks parallelization scheme. To be able to efficiently apply hierarchical density-based clustering to large datasets using MapReduce, we then propose a different parallelization scheme that computes an approximate clustering hierarchy based on a much faster, recursive sampling approach. This approach is based on HDBSCAN*, the state-of-the-art hierarchical density-based clustering algorithm, combined with a data summarization technique called data bubbles. The proposed method is evaluated in terms of both runtime and quality of the approximation on a number of datasets, showing its effectiveness and scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".