“The sun keeps rising but darkness surrounds us”: a qualitative exploration of the lived experiences of women with obstetric fistula in Ethiopia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is a hole between the vagina and bladder, and/or between the vagina and rectum, triggered by prolonged obstructed labor. The World Health Organization has estimated that at least 50,000 to 100,000 cases of obstetric fistula occur every year, and that over two million women with obstetric fistula in developing countries remain untreated. Research on women's lived experiences of obstetric fistula is limited. This study aimed to explore the lived experience of women with obstetric fistula at Bahir Dar Hamlin Fistula Center, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. METHODS: A qualitative study design, drawing from a phenomenological approach, was employed to explore the lived experience of purposively-selected sample of ten women with obstetric fistula. In-depth interviews were conducted in the local language (Amharic) using an interview guide. Interviews were transcribed and translated into English, and transcripts were entered as primary documents into Atlas.ti 7 software. Thematic categories were identified, and transcripts were coded accordingly. RESULTS: Participants perceived that the contributing factors to obstetric fistula were: instrument-assisted delivery; inappropriate physical examination and care; early marriage; and long duration of labour. As a result of obstetric fistula, the patients suffered from uncontrolled dripping of urine and/or faeces (and associated offensive odours), ostracization by their family and community members, and feeling hopeless and isolation from the community. Patients used different coping mechanisms, including frequent washing of clothes and changing of underwear; they also expressed that they preferred to be alone. CONCLUSION: Women with obstetric fistula experienced urine incontinence and associated bad odour; social and psychological problems like isolation, divorce and fears were commonly reported. Our findings from perspectives of Ethiopian setting suggest that integrated services for women with obstetric fistula are warranted, including physical therapy, psychological support and social reintegration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".