Screen Printed HF RFID Antennas on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of printed radio frequency identification (RFID) antennas is highly dependent on the electrical conductivity of the conducting tracks forming the antennas. In this paper, screen printed high frequency (HF) RFID antennas on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film are reported, with the focus on the optimization of the post-processing procedures for the improvement of the conductivity of the screen printed conductive tracks. The electrical conductivity of the printed conductive tracks is significantly affected by the ink post printing processing conditions. The results show that drying the ink at ambient temperature, followed by heat treatment provides the optimum conductivity. This treatment also offers the highest quality factors for the screen printed HF RFID antennas. It was also found that pre-drying at 60°C followed by heat treatment achieves similar results with less processing time. The findings provide a low cost solution for screen printing high performance HF RFID antennas on plastic films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it