Deep Neural Networks Classification over Encrypted Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have overtaken classic machine learning algorithms due to their superior performance in big data analysis in a broad range of applications. On the other hand, in recent years Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) has become more widespread in which a client uses cloud services for analyzing its data. However, the client's data may be sensitive which raises privacy concerns. In this paper, we address the issue of privacy preserving classification in a Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) settings and focus on convolutional neural networks (CNN). To achieve this goal, we develop new techniques to run CNNs over encrypted data. First, we design methods to approximate commonly used activation functions in CNNs (i.e. ReLU, Sigmoid, and Tanh) with low degree polynomials which is essential for a practical and efficient solution. Then, we train CNNs with approximation polynomials instead of original activation functions and implement CNNs classification over encrypted data. We evaluate the performance of our modified models at each step. The results of our experiments using several CNNs with a varying number of layers and structures are promising. When applied to the MNIST optical character recognition tasks, our approach achieved 99.25% accuracy which significantly outperforms state-of-the-art solutions and is close to the accuracy of the best non-private version. Furthermore, it can make up to 164000 predictions per hour. These results show that our approach provides accurate, efficient, and scalable privacy-preserving predictions in CNNs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it