MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924487858 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v11n2p103

Interval Tree and Its Application in Integer Factorization

2019· article· en· W2924487858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Decision-Making Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFoshan University
KeywordsMathematicsInteger (computer science)Interval (graph theory)Discrete mathematicsNode (physics)Binary treeTree (set theory)CombinatoricsInteger sequenceMapleBinary numberFactorizationAlgorithmArithmeticComputer scienceGenerating function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper first puts forward a way to study odd integers by placing the odd integers in a given interval on a perfect full binary tree, then makes an investigation on the odd integers by means of combining the original properties of the integers with the properties of the binary trees and obtains several new results on how an odd integer's divisors distribute on a level of a binary tree. The newly discovered law of divisors' distribution that includes common divisors between two symmetric nodes, genetic divisors between an ancestor node and its descendant node can provide a new and simple approach to factorize odd composite integers. Based on the mathematical deductions, numerical experiments are designed and demonstrated in the Maple software. All the results of the experiments are conformance to expectation and validate the validity of the approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it