Comparing Coordinated Networks Across the Brainstem and Spinal Cord in the Resting State and Altered Cognitive State
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resting-state (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been used to investigate networks of activity within the brain, as well as the brainstem (BS) and spinal cord (SC). While previous research has shown coordinated resting state networks (RSNs) in the BS/SC, their function is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the function of RSNs across these regions, by examining how these networks change when participants are experiencing different cognitive states (RS, listening to an audio presentation, or watching a video). RS blood oxygenation-level dependent fMRI data were obtained from the human cervical SC and BS in 20 healthy participants (14 women, 6 men), at 3 tesla, with T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo imaging. Functional connectivity was investigated within the entire three-dimensional region by means of temporal correlations between anatomical regions and by structural equation modeling (SEM). Both correlational analyses and SEM showed extensive connectivity within and across BS and SC regions, and 37% to 40% of significant connections were consistent across study conditions. However, significant differences in connectivity between specific regions of the BS and SC were also identified which depended on the study conditions. The results indicate that connectivity across the RS SC/BS is influenced by a person's cognitive/emotional state. The known anatomical functions of the regions involved support the conclusion that this RS network may play a role in the integration of homeostatic autonomic functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it