MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925221731 · doi:10.1177/0142331219832945

Robust finite–time stochastic stabilization and fault–tolerant control for uncertain networked control systems considering random delays and probabilistic actuator faults

2019· article· en· W2925221731 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Bahreini, Jafar Zarei, Roozbeh Razavi‐Far, Mehrdad Saif

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Probabilistic logicActuatorBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceNetwork packetStability (learning theory)Controller (irrigation)Fault (geology)Control (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the problem of reliable finite–time stochastic stability (FTSS) for uncertain networked control systems (NCSs). A Markovian jump system (MJS) model with partly unknown transition probabilities (TPs) for the NCSs with random delays, data packet dropouts (disorders as well) and stochastic actuator faults is established to describe the closed–loop system. A mode-dependent static output feedback controller is designed taking only the measured outputs into account. A new criterion is also derived in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) to ensure reliable FTSS of the closed–loop system, based on the stochastic stability theory. Simulation studies on a benchmark numerical example, as well as an unstable numerical example can verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207