MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2931861214 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2908598

Design and Performance Evaluation of Successive Interference Cancellation-Based Pure Aloha for Internet-of-Things Networks

2019· article· en· W2931861214 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSichuan University
KeywordsThroughputAlohaSingle antenna interference cancellationComputer scienceInterference (communication)Network packetComputer networkTelecommunicationsWirelessChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design and performance evaluation of successive interference cancellation (SIC)-based pure Aloha (PA) for Internet-of-Things (IoT) networks. To this end, a window-based SIC algorithm is presented. A throughput model of the SIC-based PA is developed and analyzed to study both throughput and packet delivery ratio (PDR) performance metrics. The numerical results show that high throughput gain can be achieved in PA, thanks to the increased PDR contributed by the SIC. Specifically, after ten iterations of the SIC, the maximum throughput gain of the SIC-based PA can achieve up to 6.55 dB over the conventional PA. The SIC efficiency results also suggest that the interference residual level after each iteration of SIC plays an important role in terms of improving throughput in PA networks. Finally, the conditions under which the proposed SIC-based PA meet both throughput and PDR performance requirements are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it