MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2935709050 · doi:10.3934/dcdss.2020077

Existence of quasiperiodic solutions of elliptic equations on the entire space with a quadratic nonlinearity

2019· article· en· W2935709050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuasiperiodic functionOrder (exchange)Space (punctuation)Quadratic equationMathematicsMathematical physicsCenter (category theory)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Mathematical analysisCombinatoricsNonlinear systemPhysicsPure mathematicsGeometryQuantum mechanicsCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the equation \begin{document}$\Delta u+{{u}_{yy}}+f(x,u) = 0,\quad (x,y)\in {{\mathbb{R}}^{N}}\times \mathbb{R}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \left( 1 \right)$ \end{document} where $ f $ is sufficiently regular, radially symmetric in $ x $, and $ f(\cdot,0)\equiv 0 $. We give sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions of (1) which are quasiperiodic in $ y $ and decaying as $ |x|\to\infty $ uniformly in $ y $. Such solutions are found using a center manifold reduction and results from the KAM theory. A required nondegeneracy condition is stated in terms of $ f_u(x,0) $ and $ f_{uu}(x,0) $, and is independent of higher-order terms in the Taylor expansion of $ f(x,\cdot) $. In particular, our results apply to some quadratic nonlinearities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it